#!/bin/bash
# the next line restarts using wish \
exec /usr/bin/wish "$0" "$@"
#: WinDash.tcl - HaJo Gurt - 2005-07-13
#: Bug-Demo: On Windows, dash-patterns only work with width 1
package require Tk
grid [canvas .c -width 300 -height 325]
# Dash-patterns: {2 4} {2 8} {6 4} {6 4 2 4} {6 4 2 4 2 4}
.c create oval 25 25 125 125 -width 1 -dash {2 4} -fill grey60
.c create oval 175 25 275 125 -width 2 -dash .
.c create line 20 150 130 150 -fill grey30 -width 1 -dash {6 4 2 4 2 4}
.c create line 170 150 280 150 -width 2 -dash {6 4 2 4}
for {set y 170} {$y<=180} {incr y} { # crude workaround for thick dashed line:
.c create line 20 $y 280 $y -fill grey30 -width 1 -dash {2 4 6 4} ;# -dash .-
}
.c create rect 25 200 125 300 -fill grey70 -width 1 -dash {6 4}
.c create rect 175 200 275 300 -width 2 -dash -The tcl-help text says "all values in the dash list will be multiplied by the line width before display. This assures that "." will always be displayed as a dot and "-" always as a dash regardless of the line width."But on Windows, it looks like the dash-pattern is ignored when the width is 2 or more.
bch I am running into this same problem. I develop a map application on an X11 system (FreeBSD) and deploy it on Windows. As you say, the dashed lines are drawn as specified on a non-Windows platform, but Windows won't do it "right." Unfortunately, the end-users of my application won't be moving to a non-Windows platform, thus I'm stuck trying to figure out how to get around this problem.I did some quick perusing of the Tk code, and I will summarize what I found below. (Note that I'm not a Tcl/Tk developer which means I could be missing some nuances and details.)The Windows dash support can be found in the file tk/win/tkWinDraw.c [1].The code of interest is in the SetUpGraphicsPort function starting on line 1182. I couldn't see any reason why this function would cause the problems we are seeing.Then I did some other searching and found this site [2] (MSDN). It has this to say:"CreatePen returns a pen with the specified width bit with the PS_SOLID style if you specify a width greater than one for the following styles: PS_DASH, PS_DOT, PS_DASHDOT, PS_DASHDOTDOT."This is corroborated a little more clearly at this site [3] where it says:"This means that, if you specify the style as PS_DASH, PS_DOT, PS_DASHDOT, or PS_DASHDOTDOT but set a width higher than 1, the line would be drawn as PS_SOLID."The bottom line appears to be this: This is a Windows-specific problem, and overcoming that using the current methodology is probably not an option. I suppose one could write their own line drawing routines, etc. (ouch)
HE 21.02.2007 All the following dashed items works like expected (8.4.7 and 8.4.14 on w2000):
grid [canvas .c -width 1025 -height 345] .c create oval 25 25 125 125 -width 1 -dash . -fill grey60 .c create oval 150 25 250 125 -width 2 -dash . -fill grey60 .c create oval 275 25 375 125 -width 1 -dash - -fill grey60 .c create oval 400 25 500 125 -width 2 -dash - -fill grey60 .c create oval 525 25 625 125 -width 1 -dash , -fill grey60 .c create oval 650 25 750 125 -width 2 -dash , -fill grey60 .c create oval 775 25 875 125 -width 1 -dash _ -fill grey60 .c create oval 900 25 1000 125 -width 2 -dash _ -fill grey60 .c create rect 25 130 125 230 -width 1 -dash . -fill grey60 .c create rect 150 130 250 230 -width 2 -dash . -fill grey60 .c create rect 275 130 375 230 -width 1 -dash - -fill grey60 .c create rect 400 130 500 230 -width 2 -dash - -fill grey60 .c create rect 525 130 625 230 -width 1 -dash , -fill grey60 .c create rect 650 130 750 230 -width 2 -dash , -fill grey60 .c create rect 775 130 875 230 -width 1 -dash _ -fill grey60 .c create rect 900 130 1000 230 -width 2 -dash _ -fill grey60 .c create rect 25 235 125 335 -width 1 -dash .- -fill grey60 .c create rect 150 235 250 335 -width 2 -dash .- -fill grey60 .c create rect 275 235 375 335 -width 1 -dash -. -fill grey60 .c create rect 400 235 500 335 -width 2 -dash -. -fill grey60AM I can confirm this under Windows XP, using 8.4.1 even and up to absurd widths like -width 20. I think it was mainly a problem under Windows 95. Still, the dot/dash patterns can not be as general as for Linux/UNIX.
bch Verified on XP for me. I have to admit I hadn't tested it on anything newer than win98 (which is the minimum configuration I support). Thanks to HE and AM for the comments.
